Garrett et al v. BNC Mortgage Inc. et al
| Michelle Garrett and Richard L. Garrett |
| BNC Mortgage Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., US Bank National Association, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. and Aronowitz & Mecklenburg, LLP |
| 1:2011cv03242 |
| December 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Eagle |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER. ORDERED that defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., U.S. Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Under Rule 54(b) 120 is DENIED. Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 09/08/15.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER granting 115 Motion to Strike. Ordered that the paper filed by Deborah Alex-Saunders [Doc. #113] is STRICKEN by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/09/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 108 is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that Defendants U.S. Bank's and Wells Fargo's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment 99 is GRANTED. ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion f or Sum mary Judgment 100 is DENIED. ORDERED that the Motion to Clarify Service Date of Plaintiffs' Objection to Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [DKT. 111] 112 is DENIED as moot. ORDERED that this case shall be administratively closed, subject to reopening for good cause, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. ORDERED that, no later than twenty days after resolution of defendant BNC Mortgage, Inc.'s bankruptcy proceedings, the parties shall file a status report with the Court as to whether they believe the case should be reopened for good cause for any further proceedings in this Court or whether the case may be dismissed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 08/26/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER denying without prejudice 50 Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony, 73 Motion to Compel Deposition of Expert Witness, or Alternatively, For an Order Precluding the Expert From Testifying, 76 Motion for Summary Judgment and Suppo rting Brief, 78 Declaration and Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Unidentified Witnesses of U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo, and 79 Declaration and Verified Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties must resubmit their motions for summary judgment, if at all, on or before 1/17/2014. The supporting briefs shall comply with the district judge's Practice Standards and Rule 56, Fed. R. Civ. P. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/3/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER denying 84 Move [sic] Court to Review of Magistrate Order as Void. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/10/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 65 and 67 Motion to Quash by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/15/13.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying 59 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order for Extension of Time to File Discovery Documents. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/30/13.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTE ORDER granting 55 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Take Expert Deposition After Discovery cut-Off Date. Parties are to depose expert Deborah Alex-Saunders by 5/24/2013. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/17/13.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER. The 30 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is accpeted in part. The 22 Motion to Dismiss by Defendants U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, and MERS and Supporting Brief is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs' complaint i s dismissed with respect to defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. Claims one and two are dismissed with respect to defendant Wells Fargo. Claims one and two survive with respect to defendant U.S. Bank. Claims three through six ar e dismissed. Claims seven through thirteen are dismissed with respect to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-105. Claims seven through thirteen survive with respect to Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 38-40-105, 12-61-904.5, and 12-61-911. Claims fourteen through sixteen are dismissed. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/7/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 31 RECOMMENDATION. Defendant Aronowitz & Mecklenburg, LLP's 17 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (2), (5), and (6) is granted, and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice as against defendant Aronowitz & Mecklenburg, LLP. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/23/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER. Plaintiffs' 2 Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied. The 12/21/2011 hearing on motion is vacated. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/20/11.(mnfsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
