Bond Safeguard Insurance Company v. Ridgeview Development, LLC et al
| Bond Safeguard Insurance Company |
| Ridgeview Development, LLC, SWAT I, LLC, ROCOLO I, LLC, Mark Morley, Susan Morley, Carmel O'Sullivan, Robin L. Morley and Jim Morley |
| 1:2011cv03275 |
| December 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William J. Martinez |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
AMENDED ORDER re: 24 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, Order on Motion for Ruling, The original order issued on September 28, 2012 is amended to accurately recite the name of Plaintiffs Motion. by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/1/2012. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against All Parties ECF No. 22 is GRANTED; As the Court has now ruled on its Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, Plaintiffs Emergency Request for Ruling on Motion of Default Judgment ECF No. 23 is DENIED as moot; The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against all Defendants in the amount of $491,054.50 plus post-judgment interest by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/28/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 3/8/2012 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/16/2011. (kmtcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
