Miller v. Lusk et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Brent Miller
Defendant: Lusk, Bast and Odell
Case Number: 1:2011cv03365
Filed: December 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Teller
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 146 JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Bast, Lusk, Martinez, Odell against Daniel Brent Miller pursuant to ORDER 145 . by Clerk on 2/3/14. (rbjcd, )
January 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 145 ORDER adopting 130 Report and Recommendations. finding as moot 123 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 144 Motion for Summary Judgment. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/29/14.(rbjcd, )
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER denying 107 Motion to Amend and Order to Show Cause. Show Cause Response due by 9/20/2013. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/26/13.(bnbcd, )
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER denying 112 Motion for Order Regarding Doc. 110 Or, in the Alternative, for Modification of Scheduling Order. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/25/13.(bnbcd, )
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 106 MINUTE ORDER granting 104 Defendants' Motion to Allow Inmate Deposition Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and defendants are allowed to take the deposition of plaintiff Daniel Brent Miller on or bef ore August 2, 2013. The defendants' counsel will work with the Colorado Department of Corrections to schedule a date and time that is amenable to accommodating this deposition at the Limon Correctional Facility (or any facility plaintiff may be transferred to). By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 07/08/13. (alvsl)
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER. (1) The Motion Requesting an Order By the Courts Directing the Colorado Department of Corrections to Comply with Federal Access Requirements (Doc. # 91 ) is STRICKEN; (2) All papers shall be served on counsel for the defendants in accordan ce with Rule 5 and shall be accompanied by a proper Certificate of Service; and (3) Failure to comply with this order will result in sanctions, including dismissal of this action with prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/29/13. (alvsl)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER denying 84 Motion to Stay Proceedings. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/25/13.(bnbcd, )
April 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Documents ## 57 , 58 , 71 , 76 , and 77 are STRICKEN; Documents ## 73 , 78 , and 80 are DENIED; and The plaintiff shall cease filing inappropriate papers. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this action with prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/10/13. (alvsl)
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER. Defendant's motion to dismiss 18 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is granted as to claims 2 and 4 and denied as to claims 1 and 3. Plaintiff's motion to file an amended response out of time and for leave to file an amen ded complaint 47 is DENIED. The magistrate's order and recommendation denying plaintiff's motion to file an amended response out of time and for leave to file an amended complaint 53 is ADOPTED. The magistrate's recommendation to GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART defendants' motion to dismiss 54 is ADOPTED. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 03/11/13. (alvsl)
May 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER. The Motion 25 is DENIED without prejudice. Any future attempts to amend the Complaint shall comply with this order; and The Clerk of the Court shall provide the plaintiff with a copy of the courts Prisoner Complaint form. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/29/2012.(sahsl, )
March 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/5/2012. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Lusk et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lusk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Odell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Brent Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?