Sellers v. Kelly Services Inc. et al
| Michael M. Sellers |
| Kelly Services Inc. and IBM Corporation |
| 1:2011cv03416 |
| December 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 53 Unopposed Motion For Relief by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 01/14/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT. ORDERED that plaintiffs amended complaint and this civil action are dismissed without prejudice by Clerk on 09/20/12. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 38 Unopposed Motion for Relief, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/26/12.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
33
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 29 Motion To Enter Amendment of Relief and 31 Motion to Appear Telephone, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/21/12.(sgrim) Modified on 6/22/2012 to include MINUTE in text (sgrim, ).
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER of Recusal. Clerk to randomly reassign this case to another judge of this Court, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/26/12. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/12/2012. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/9/12. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
