Carrillo et al v. Castle, Stawiarki, LLC et al
| Juan De Dios Munoz Gonzalez, Jeannette Pina, Alfonso A. Carrillo, Nora G. Gonzalez Cuevas, Jaime Escobedo, Rocio G. Villarreal, Jose A. Charupe, Maria C. Fernandez, Alvaro Nunez, Jose Agustin Telles, Jose Gonzalez, Maria E. Elias, Elda Urquidi, Ernesto Ledezma, Hugo Pacheco Ortiz, Pedro Barron Chavez, Josefa Ortega, Sergio Hernandez, Juan Pablo Reyes-Cruz, Gonzalo Perez, Selene Robles, Lina Gisela Molina, Silvia Dorado, Hector Pina, Claudia Orozco Molina, Ana Luisa Chavez, Elizabeth Padilla, German Jasso Bruno, Laura Gutierrez, Julio Arreguin and Rudy Breda |
| Government Technology Systems (GTS), Hopp Law Firm, LLC, The, Gary Glenn, Robert J. Hopp, Castle, Stawiarki, LLC and Lawrence Castle |
| 1:2012cv00003 |
| January 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| William J. Martinez |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
ORDER Magistrate Judge Hegartys Recommendation ECF No. 245 , is ACCEPTED; The claims brought by Plaintiffs Rocio G. Villareal, Jose A. Charupe, Maria Fernandez, Elda Urquidi, and Ernesto Ledezma are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prose cute and failure to comply with multiple Court Orders; As these were the only Plaintiffs remaining in this action, the Clerk shall close this case and enter judgment in favor of Defendants; and All parties shall bear their own costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/27/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER Granting 250 Unopposed Motion brought by those Plaintiffs represented by the Law Office of Douglas Romero LLC to Dismiss their Claims Without Prejudice. Each party shall bear his/her or its own attorneys fees and costs. The claims of non-represented Plaintiffs, Rocio G. Villarreal, Jose A. Charupe, Maria C. Fernandez, Elda Urquidi, and Ernesto Ledezma are not affected in any manner by this Order of Dismissal. by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/20/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
243
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing and Status conference held on 4/5/2012, taking under advisement 89 Defendant Entravision Communications Corporation's (Univision) M otion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(5). The Court will issue a recommendation that the five Plaintiffs who were not present at today's hearing be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court's orders. (FTR: C. Coomes - Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER denying 97 Plaintiffs fourth Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction, which the Court construes as a Motion to Reconsider, is DENIED. The Court also DENIES without prejudice Plaintiffs request to add more individuals as party-plaintiffs to this action, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/24/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER Denying 74 Plaintiffs' MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. However, Plaintiffs Motion also, in the alternative, seeks injunctive relief, the Court finds that the most prudent way to treat the instant Motion is to convert it to a motion for a preliminary injunction and allow Defendants an opportunity to be heard on the converted motion. Plaintiffs are therefore ORDERED to serve a copy of the February 16, 2012 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Injunctive Relief on Defendants CBS 4 News and Univision as soon as possible. Additionally, the Court ORDERS Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs converted motion for preliminary injunction not later than February 24, 2012. After all parties have had an opportunity to be heard on the issue, the Court will consider the merits of Plaintiffs converted motion for preliminary injunction, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/17/2012. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 26 Plaintiff's Motion to Join Additional Defendants as Listed in Caption Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 19(a). In addition, the Court notes that the docket in this case reflects that orders mailed to several Plaintiffs have been returned as undeliverable. The Court reminds the Plaintiffs that they are obligated under the local rules to promptly provide the Court with correct addresses and telephone numbers. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/24/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 19 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for TRO;and denying 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/18/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER As part of the 1 Complaint, Plaintiffs request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice, by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/4/2011. (ervsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
