Archangel Diamond Corporation Liquidating Trust v. OAO Lukoil
| Archangel Diamond Corporation Liquidating Trust |
| OAO Lukoil |
| 1:2012cv00041 |
| January 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Dismiss as indicated in the attached order, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/18/2014.(tscha, )
|
|
Filing
99
MINUTE ENTRY for Oral Argument Hearing held on 11/19/2013 before Judge Raymond P. Moore, taking under advisement 29 Motion to Dismiss. Court Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt. (rmcd)
|
|
Filing
59
MINUTE ORDER granting 57 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Vacate the Status Conference. Status Conference 7/6/2012 2:00 PM is vacated. Status Report due by 8/1/2012, and the first day of each month thereafter until Judge Brimmer rules on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 29 , by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/5/2012.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant to Disclose Whether It is "Subject to Jurisdiction in Any States Court of General Jurisdiction" Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)(2). Denying 41 Plaintiff's Motio n for Leave to Take Personal Jurisdictional Discovery Regarding DS Engineering, Inc. and Expedited Briefing. Denying 43 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Personal Jurisdictional Discovery. Discovery is STAYED pending ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 29 . Each party pay their own attorney fees and costs for these motions. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/10/2012.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
25
MINUTE ORDER denying 18 Motion for Sanctions; granting 20 Motion to Vacate. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 3/15/12, at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED. Status Conference set for 4/24/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/6/2012.(jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
6
AMENDED ORDER re: 4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/24/12. [amended to correct spelling] (pabcd)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 3/15/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/23/2012. (mjwcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Archangel Diamond Corporation Liquidating Trust v. OAO Lukoil | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: OAO Lukoil | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Archangel Diamond Corporation Liquidating Trust | |
| Represented By: | Bruce Samuel Marks |
| Represented By: | Chad Michael McShane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
