Bynum v. Hancock et al
| Cecil Bynum |
| Robert Hart, Robert (I) Hart, Michael (I) Hancock, Keri Johnson, Keri (I) Johnson, David Ryan, David (I) Ryan, A. P. Richmond, A. P. (I) Richmond, J. Casias, J. (I) Casias, J. Andrews, J. (I) Andrews, J. (I) Simmons, J. Simmons and Michael Hancock |
| 1:2012cv00064 |
| January 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Kit Carson |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER Directing Prison to Disburse Funds for Monthly Payments. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/11/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
89
FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that plaintiffs claims, the amended complaint and this civil action are dismissed with prejudice by Clerk on 03/13/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Watanabe's Recommendation 72 is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. ORDERED that plaintiff, Cecil Bynum's, Objections to Recommendation 79 are OVERRULED. ORDERED that Bynums claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERED that Bynums Motion For An Extension Of Time 74 is DENIED AS MOOT by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/12/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
87
MINUTE ORDER. ORDERED that such document (Docket No. 85) shall be docketed as a Reply to the Defendants' Response to Objection to Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 80 rather than as a motion. It does not appear to be an actual motion although it as captioned as such by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/08/13 (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
67
MINUTE ORDER granting 65 Motion for Permission To file a Sur-Reply by 10/19/12 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/05/12.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
60
MINUTE ORDER granting 58 plaintiff's Motion Requesting a Copy of the Court Order. The Clerk of Court shall send the plaintiff a copy of this court's Minute Order dated August 14, 2012 53 , by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/13/2012.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
53
Minute ORDER. ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference 51 is granted, and thus the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for August 27, 2012, is vacated. ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Facilitate and Clarify Court's Stipulated Court Order 47 is denied as moot by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 08/14/12.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 8/27/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 06/15/12. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
15
MINUTE ORDER denying 12 Motion for Excusable Neglect by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/06/12.(nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/13/12. (lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
11
Minute ORDER denying 10 Motion Requesting Modification of Court Ordered Payments, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/2/12.(lyg, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Review of the Trial Courts and Court of Appeals Decision Pursuant to 24-10-109, C.R.S. Section 13-80-103 3 is denied as premature and unnecessary, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/17/12.(lyg, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/1/12. (lsw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
