Rea v. Re/Max,L.L.C. et al
| David W. Rea |
| Re/Max,L.L.C., David Liniger, Margaret Kelly, John Dupont and Mike Reagan |
| 1:2012cv00090 |
| January 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/19/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
24
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/18/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying 19 Defendant's Second Motion to Dismiss or Strike, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/23/2012.(rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Denying 10 Motion to Dismiss. Failure to state claims for relief and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the third and fourth claims for relief are dismissed and because the plaintiff has clarified that the first and second claims for relief are not alleged against the individual defendants, they are dismissed from this civil action. In all other respects as to the first and second claims for relief, the scope of which will be considered at the scheduling conference, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/8/2012.(rpmcd) Modified to add further language of Order on 3/8/2012 (rpmcd).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
