Bush et al v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
| Charles Bush, Brad Grimsley, Mark L. Hanson and John F. Noble |
| FedEx Freight, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv00230 |
| January 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ORDER granting 149 the parties Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorneys fees. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the 10-day jury trial set to commence on May 5, 2014 and the Final Trial Preparation set April 17, 2014, are VACATED, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/13/2013.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
121
MINUTE ORDER. Motion to Strike Directed to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant'sMotion for Summary Judgment 108 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defe ndant's Motion for Summary Judgment Pending Determination onDefendant's Motion to Strike 109 is GRANTED. Defendant's Reply Brief shall be filed on or before Friday, September 5, 2013. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Strike and Re-File Exhibits as Restricted or Redacted 117 is GRANTED by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/22/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Preclude John Hill from Testifying as an Expert (ECF No. 53) and Defendant's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Jerry Ogden (ECF No. 97) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/15/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
85
MINUTE ORDER granting 82 Motion to Withdraw. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to terminate Attorney Barkley as counsel of record, and to remove his name fromthe electronic certificate of mailing, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/9/13.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
80
MINUTE ORDER; Defendant's 78 Opposed Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Oral Motion for Sanctions re Spoliation is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a Surreply to Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Oral Motion for Sanctions re Spoliation on or before April 8, 2013, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/2/2013.(klmcd, ) Modified on 4/2/2013 to indicate Motion 78 was oppposed (klmcd, ).
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 33 Motion for Leave to Amend Answer. ORDERED that the Court accepts Defendant's First Amended Answer [33-3] for filing as of the date of this Order by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/10/12.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Second and Third Claims for Relief (Age Discrimination under the ADEA (Pattern or Practice) and Age Discrimination under the ADEA (Disparate Impact)) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to pay his or its own costs and attorney fees with respect to the dismissed claims by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/15/12. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER granting 30 Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/05/12.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER granting 27 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order Regarding Expert Witness Disclosures by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 09/18/12.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER granting 24 Joint Motion for Amendment of Scheduling Order Regarding Expert Witness Disclosures, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/30/12.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/31/2012. (klmcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
