Palardy v. A.B.C.D. Soderberg's, LLC et al
Chandelle Palardy |
A.B.C.D. Soderberg's, LLC and Dan Soderberg |
1:2012cv00234 |
January 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Richard P. Matsch |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/7/2013. (rpmcd) |
Filing 54 Courtroom Minutes for Trial Preparation Conference held on 7/12/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendants' Emergency Motion to Reschedule the Pretrial Conference 53 , is moot. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants Expert Witness 50 , is resolved as stated on record. Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Court Order to Defendant ABCD Soderberg to Produce Financial Information and for Sanctions 52 , is resolved with respect to production of financial informatio n and denied with respect for sanctions. Final lists of exhibits and witnesses, proposed voir dire and proposed instructions are to be submitted in paper directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. July 31, 2013. Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time for the Parties to Serve Trial Exhibit Objections 51 , is moot. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd) |
Filing 49 Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 6/17/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Pretrial Order 43 , is denied.FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd) |
Filing 36 ORDER : trial to jury on August 12, 2013, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom A and trial preparation conference is set for July 12, 2013, at 2:00p.m. in the Conference Room. Counsel shall submit proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, lists of witnesses and exhibits and statement of the case at the trial preparation conference, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/22/2012. (rpmcd) |
Filing 33 Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 3/4/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendants' Motion to Conduct F.R.C.P. 35 Examination of Plaintiff 23 , is granted for the limited purpose as stated on record. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd) |
Filing 22 ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference for 3/22/2013 at 02:00 PM in Conference Room, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4:00 p.m., 3/14/2013, lead counsel present in person and no parties or representatives permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/2/2013. (rpmcd) |
Filing 21 Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 12/19/2012 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Of Defendants Financial Information 16 , is granted with respect to Mr. Soderberg and his business tax ret urns. Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Expert Designation Deadlines and Discovery Cut-off for Limited Purposes 15 , is granted with respect to the expert reports of Dr. Weissberg and Dr. Post. Defendant may file a motion pursuant to Rule 35 with r espect to an I.M.E. of the plaintiff by January 18, 2013. Pretrial conference scheduled March 22, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. Defendant Dan Soderbergs Motion for Protective Order 19 , is moot based on today's ruling in open court. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd) |
Filing 8 PROTECTIVE ORDER re 7 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/1/2012. (rpmcd) |
Filing 4 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 3/29/2012 at 11:30 AM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 22, 2012, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/21/2012. (rpmcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.