Hart v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Debra A. Hart
Defendant: Dillon Companies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00238
Filed: January 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Archuleta
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER granting 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter JUDGMENT in Defendant's favor. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/3/2014.(tscha, )
July 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting 53 Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence Doc. # 53 and sets a hearing and oral argument as to what sanctions should be imposed on October 10, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. before the Court at 103 Sheppard Drive, Room 235, Durango, Colorado, by Magistrate Judge David L. West on 7/9/2013.(ervsl, )
December 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RESTRICT PUBLIC ACCESS [DOC #46] granting 46 Motion for Order and Motion for Leave to Restrict. By Magistrate Judge David L. West on 12/26/2012. (klyon, )
October 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS: City Market's Motion to Dismiss 10 is DENIED. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/10/12.(msksec, )
October 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 PROTECTIVE ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation and Agreement. By Magistrate Judge David L. West on 10/2/2012. (klyon, )
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER RE: DEFENDANT DILLON COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a CITY MARKET'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER granting 22 Motion to Amend Answer. By Magistrate Judge David L. West on 09/27/2012. (klyon, )
April 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/20/12. (msksec, )
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 4/20/2012 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/13/12. (cbssec)
February 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/10/12. (mskcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hart v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon Companies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debra A. Hart
Represented By: Reid Browne Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?