Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Insurance-website.com, Darrin Bagnuolo and Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Interested_party: Bankrate, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00262
Filed: January 31, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER CLOSING CASE: This matter is before the court sua sponte. This case was initiated with the filing of a motion to compel [# 1 ] by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. On 5/11/2012, Magistrate Judge Mix entered an order [ 20 ] resolving the issues raised in the motion to compel [# 1 ]. Because there are no pending claims or issues in this case, I order that this case be closed. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/8/2014. (alowe)
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 1 Motion to Compel. It is granted as to Plaintiff's request that Bankrate produce the agreements and documents regarding payments made or commissions paid and sales leads specified in the subpoena. It is denied as to the request for correspondence. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bankrate shall produce documents pursuant to the subpoena on or before May 21, 2012, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/11/12.(mjgsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Insurance-website.com
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darrin Bagnuolo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Robert Noel
Represented By: Wendy M. Mantell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested_party: Bankrate, Inc.
Represented By: Scott Warren Dangler
Represented By: Kenneth F. Rossman, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Bradley S. Freedberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?