Horton v. Rangel et al
Willie Horton |
Blake R. Davis, Mark Collins, P. Rangel, D. Foster and A. Fenlon |
1:2012cv00349 |
February 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Boyd N. Boland |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER denying 49 Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Judgment. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/4/13.(kfinn, ) |
Filing 48 JUDGMENT by Clerk. re: 46 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Report and Recommendations, 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies. By Clerk on 2/11/13. (kfinn, ) |
Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/14/12. (mjgsl, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER: denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Dismiss, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/18/12.(bnbcd, ) |
Filing 14 ORDER : re: 11 Amendment to complaint filed by Willie Horton is accepted for filing, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/22/12. (bnbcd, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw in Part to District Judge and Magistrate Judge. The Complaint with respect to the court access and photocopy claims asserted against Defendants Blake R. Davis, Mark Collins, and A Fenlon is dismissed as legally fr ivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Complaint with respect to the retaliation claims asserted against Defendants P. Rangel, D. Foster, and A. Fenlon shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. Defendants Blake R. Davis and Mark Collins shall be terminated as parties to this action. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/27/2012. (sah, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. The Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification 2 is DENIED as unnecessary, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/14/12. (lsw, ) Modified on 2/14/2012 to add text re: 2 (lsw, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.