Ferguson v. Ferguson
| Royce Ferguson |
| Emily Ferguson |
| 1:2012cv00508 |
| February 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 11601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER. Docket Nos. 9 and 14 shall be restricted at level one. Petitioner shall re-file without filing restrictions redacted copies of Docket Nos. 9 and 14 that comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a) and shall certify that all of petitioner's filings in this matter, including all exhibits thereto, comply with Rule 5.2(a) on or before 5:00 PM on 4/16/2012. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/11/12. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER. On or before 5:00 PM on Friday, 3/9/2012, petitioner shall re-file without filing restrictions a redacted copy of Docket No. 2 that complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Petitioner shall show cause why he failed to comply with the Courts February 29 and March 6 orders and why the Court should not impose some form of sanction for the repeated failure to comply with the Court's orders. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/8/12. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER. Petitioner's 11 Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice is granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). This case is dismissed without prejudice and shall be closed in its entirety. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/7/12.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER. On or before 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, 3/7/2012,petitioner shall re-file without filing restrictions redacted copies of Docket Nos. 1, 2 and 6 that comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a) and shall show cause why he failed to comply with the Court's 2/29 Order [Docket No. 5]. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/6/2012. (jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER. Docket Nos. 1 , 2 , and 4 shall be restricted at Level One. On or before 5:00 PM on Friday, March 2, 2012, petitioner shall re-file without filing restrictions redacted copies of Docket Nos. 1 and 2 that comply with Federal Rule of Ci vil Procedure 5.2(a). The Clerk of the Court shall re-file without filing restrictions a redacted copy of Docket No. 4 that reveals only the initials of the minor children. The Clerk of the Court shall also remove the minor childrens names from the Electronic Case Filing caption and replace them with the minor children's initials. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/29/12. (mnfsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ferguson v. Ferguson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Royce Ferguson | |
| Represented By: | Heather Sanders Broxterman |
| Represented By: | Ann Catherine Gushurst |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Emily Ferguson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
