Layne Christensen Company v. Mill Man Steel, Inc.
| Layne Christensen Company |
| Mill Man Steel, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv00519 |
| February 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 40 Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Dispositive Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/11/13.(kfinn, )
|
|
Filing
54
MINUTE ORDER granting 52 Unopposed Motion to Add National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford as a Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall amend the caption to reflect the addition of National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford as a Plaintiff. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/30/13. (kfinn, )
|
|
Filing
49
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/3/2014. Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference are set for 1/10/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Five (5) day Jury Trial set for 1/27/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/23/13. (rebsec, )
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying Defendant Lincoln Manufacturing, Inc's 27 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/7/2012. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER of Dismissal Of Plaintiff Layne Christensen Company's Claims Against Defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. ORDERED The Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff Layne Christensen Companys Claims Against Defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. With Prejudice 42 is GRANTED. The claims asserted against defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/23/12.(lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTE ORDER granting 9 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Postpone Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 5/1/12, is VACATED and RESET to 7/5/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures on or before 6/29/12, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/24/12.(mjgsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Layne Christensen Company v. Mill Man Steel, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mill Man Steel, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Layne Christensen Company | |
| Represented By: | Virginia L. Olmstead |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
