Frye v. Clements et al
| Gregory P. Frye |
| Tom Clements and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, John Suthers |
| 1:2012cv00722 |
| March 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Kit Carson |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER Denying 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Application by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/13/13. No certificate of appealability will issue, and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER. The "Motion for Loan of Record" (ECF No. 36 ) and "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis" (ECF No. 35 ) that Applicant, Gregory P. Frye, filed pro se on January 16, 2013, are denied as premature. It is FURTHER ORDERED th at a copy of this order be mailed to Mr. Frye at both the temporary address he provided on January 16, 2013 (ECF No. 37 ), i.e., the El Paso County Criminal Justice Center, 2739 East Las Vegas Street, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906, and at the Kit Carson Correctional Center in Burlington, Colorado, where he otherwise is incarcerated. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 01/17/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and for Answer re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gregory P. Frye. For the reasons stated within, the application will be denied in part and drawn in part. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the followi ng claims are dismissed as procedurally barred: claims one, three, four, and the claim two arguments concerning the invalidity of Applicant's guilty plea other than the assertion that his guilty plea was involuntary because it was coerced by erroneous evidentiary rulings by the trial court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that claim six is dismissed as not a cognizable habeas corpus claim and an insufficient argument to excuse exhaustion of Applicant's third claim. It is FURTHER ORDERED th at within thirty (30) days of the filing of the state court record Respondents are directed to file an answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of the following exhausted claims: t he portion of claim two asserting that Applicant's guilty plea was involuntary because it was coerced by erroneous evidentiary rulings by the trial court, and claim five. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the filing of the answer Applicant may file a reply, if he desires. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 01/03/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/27/2012. (sks)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Overruling the 21 Objection to Continuance filed by Gregory P. Frye, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/29/12. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
14
Amended ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response re: 12 by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/30/2012. (skssl, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/26/2012. (skssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
