Duran v. Davis et al
| Ronald Duran |
| John Davis and John Suthers |
| 1:2012cv00877 |
| April 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Chaffee |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 9 Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this case with prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/11/12. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER to Dismiss in Part: Claims 1, 4, and a portion of 3 are dismissed. Respondents are to file an answer within 30 days, and Applicant may file a reply within 30 days of the answer. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/24/12. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/19/12. (nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER To File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/01/2012. (nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Applicant to File Amended Pleading by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/17/2012. (skssl, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/13/12. (nmmsl, ) Modified on 4/13/2012: this was entered in the wrong case, and was re-entered in correct case. (nmmsl, ).
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/05/2012. (skssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
