Diaz et al v. USA
| Sean Timmons, Shera Diaz and Roger Porter |
| USA |
| 1:2012cv01069 |
| April 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Insurance |
| 38 U.S.C. ยง 1975 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT by Clerk re 26 : Judgment is entered in the amount of $5,000 in favor of Plaintiff Shera Diaz for attorney's fees in this action; Judgment is entered in the amount of $5,000 in favor of Plaintiff Roger Porter for his attorney's fees in this action, and Judgment is entered in the amount of $5,000 in favor of Plaintiff Sean Timmons for his attorney's fees in this action, by Clerk on 7/17/2014. (jsmit)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER FOR REMAND: the administrative decisions denying TSGLI benefits for Plaintiffs Shera Diaz, Roger Porter and Sean Timmons are vacated and these matters are remanded to the United States Army for further consideration, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/22/2014. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time re: 1 Complaint : Defendant's deadline extended pending further order of the Court, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/25/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Vacating 4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/4/2012. (rpmcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
