Potter Voice Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc, et al
Potter Voice Technologies LLC, |
Apple, Inc.,, Google, Inc.,, HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony Corporation of America,, LG Electronics, Inc.,, LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.,, Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc.,, Kyocera Corporation,, Sharp Corporation,, Sharp Electronics Corporation,, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,, Huawei America, Inc.,, Pantech Wireless, Inc., Research In Motion Limited, Research In Motion Corporation,, Microsoft Corporation,, Nokia Corporation, and Nokia, Inc., |
1:2012cv01096 |
April 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Adams |
William J. Martinez |
Craig B. Shaffer |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0101 (35:101 Patent Infringement) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Magistrate Judge Shaffer is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 04/26/2012. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 6 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action mailed to Commissioner of Patent (johar, ) Modified on 4/25/2012 to reflect Patent and not Trademark(johar, ). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. Magistrate Judge Consent Form attached. (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons, # 6 Summons, # 7 Summons, # 8 Summons, # 9 Summons, # 10 Summons, # 11 Summons, # 12 Summons, # 13 Summons, # 14 Summons, # 15 Summons, # 16 Summons, # 17 Summons, # 18 Summons, # 19 Summons, # 20 Summons, # 21 Summons, # 22 Summons, # 23 Summons, # 24 Summons, # 25 Summons, # 26 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (johar, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Text Only Entry (johar, ) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Clayton, Frank) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Plaintiff Potter Voice Technologies LLC (Clayton, Frank) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringment and Jury Demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 350, Receipt Number 1082-2809447), filed by Potter Voice Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons, # 6 Summons, # 7 Summons, # 8 Summons, # 9 Summons, # 10 Summons, # 11 Summons, # 12 Summons, # 13 Summons, # 14 Summons, # 15 Summons, # 16 Summons, # 17 Summons, # 18 Summons, # 19 Summons, # 20 Summons, # 21 Summons, # 22 Summons, # 23 Summons, # 24 Summons, # 25 Summons, # 26 Summons, # 27 Summons)(Clayton, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.