Vega v. Davis
Raymond Vega |
Blake R. Davis |
1:2012cv01144 |
May 1, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Richard P. Matsch |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 ORDER that the defendants motion to dismiss is granted and the Clerk shall entered judgment dismissing this civil action with an award of costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/31/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 56 ORDER Granting 47 Motion for Relief from Judgment and Leave to Amend Complaint. Final Judgment 46 entered on November 13, 2014, is vacated and the plaintiff has to and including June 15, 2015, within which to file a new amended complaint, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/23/2015. (ktera) |
Filing 54 MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing proceedings held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/16/2015. Granting 47 Motion for Leave. Plaintiff shall have to and including June 15, 2015 to file the amended complaint. FTR: Kathy Terasaki. (babia) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting 47 Blake Daviss motion for a 10-day extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from Judgment and for Leave to Amend Complaint up to and including January 15, 2015, to respond to the motion, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/29/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 46 FINAL JUDGMENT re: 45 Order, by Clerk on 11/13/2014. (jsmit) |
Filing 40 ORDER Granting [Doc. 76 in 12-cv-01570-RPM] Motion for Leave to Depose Incarcerated Witness Richie Antonio Hill, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/22/2013 (12-cv-01144-RPM and 12-cv-01570-RPM).(rpmcd). |
Filing 32 ORDER Granting 31 Motion for Leave: Plaintiffs in both of the above captioned actions are granted leave to take the deposition of JOHN J. POWERS (BOP Register No. 03220-028) at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, beginning on June 25, 2013, and continuing thereafter until completed, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/17/2013.(rpmcd) |
Filing 24 Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 4/23/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Davis, 14 in case 12-cv-01144-RPM, is granted with respect to the First Amendment Claim and denied in all other respects. Defendant shall file an answer in accordance with the rules. Conference set for 5/24/2013 AT 02:00 PM in Conference Room (requirement of Rule 16 not applicable). FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd ) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting 11 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint re 1 and [11-1]: Amended Complaint attached to Plaintiff's motion is hereby accepted for filing, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/31/2012.(rpmcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vega v. Davis | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raymond Vega | |
Represented By: | Edwin Packard Aro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Blake R. Davis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.