Kansas Wheat Alliance, Inc. et al v. Thunderbird Seed Conditioning LLC et al
| Kansas Wheat Alliance, Inc. and Kansas State University Research Foundation |
| Thunderbird Seed Conditioning LLC and Thunderbird Commodities LLC |
| 1:2012cv01171 |
| May 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| R. Brooke Jackson |
| Agricultural Acts |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 2321 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/17/2014. (trlee, )
|
|
Filing
88
MINUTE ORDER granting 81 the Opposed Amended Motion to Compel Nonparty Ron Drosselmeyer to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/6/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
80
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 74 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Nonparty Ron Dresselmeyer to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/23/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting 66 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint and Add Parties. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the [66-1] Second Amended Complaint. Defendants shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and all applicable local and federal rules. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/17/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Defendants Thunderbird Seed Conditioning, LLC's and Thunderbird Commodities LLC's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 is denied. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/3/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
69
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 9/25/2013, taking under advisement 51 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' response to 66 Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint and Add Parties is due by 10/15/2013. The Clerk of the Court shall lift any restrictions on all documents in this case. FTR: C. Pearson -- Courtroom A-501. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
50
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/22/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 46 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/17/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 34 Defendants Thunderbird Seed Conditioning, LLC and Thunderbird Commodities LLC'S Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/15/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 21 Defendants Thunderbird Seed Conditioning, LLC and Thunderbird Commodities LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). Entry of judgment in favor of Defendant shall be stayed for a period of 10 days following this Order, in the event Plaintiffs choose to file an Amended Complaint, for which leave is granted. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/7/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
30
TRIAL PROCEDURES ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/18/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 05/09/2012. (rbjsec. )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
