Redwine v. Medina et al
Terrence S. Redwine |
Angel Medina and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
1:2012cv01217 |
May 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Lincoln |
Boyd N. Boland |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER Denying 28 USC § 2254 Application. ORDERED that the habeas corpus application is denied, and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his own costs and attorney's fees. No certificate of appealability will issue. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/3/13. (sgrim) |
Filing 29 ORDER for Supplemental State Court Record. ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete transcript from the secon d revocation hearing held on June 16, 2009, in People v. Redwine, Denver District Court Case No. 07CR7213. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this order to the following: Denver District Court and Court Services Manager, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/11/13. (sgrim) |
Filing 26 Second Order for Answer. ORDERED that Respondents are directed to file an answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of exhausted claim three, the only remaining claim, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days of the filing of the answer Applicant, Terrence S. Redwine, may file a reply, if he desires, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/19/12. (sgrim) |
Filing 23 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and for Answer. ORDERED that Applicant's motion to dismiss claims one and two 17 is granted, and claims one and two are dismissed voluntarily without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent claim three asserts that the trial court violated state law by imposing a four year prison sentence, the claim is dismissed. FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent claim three asserts a federal constitutional claim that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the probation revocation, the claim is exhausted. FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the filing of the state court record Respondents are directed to file an answer, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/11/12.(lygsl, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/10/12. (nmmsl, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER Directing Respondents to File Second Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/17/12. (nmmsl, ) |
Filing 13 ORDER Directing Applicant to File Amended Application, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/29/2012. (skssl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.