Baek et al. v. ARC International North America Holdings Inc. et al.
| Fred Min and Mi Kyong Baek |
| ARC International North America Holdings Inc., ARC International Holdings Inc. and Modny, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv01247 |
| May 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| John L. Kane |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
Final Judgment. ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered in favor of the Defendant, Arc International North America Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, and against the Plaintiffs, Mi Kyong Baek and Fred Min. ORDERED that each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees. ORDERED that Defendant shall be awarded its cost by the filing of the Bill of Costs within 14 days of entry of judgment by Clerk on 11/06/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 41 Arc's Motion for Summary Judgment. Arc's Motion forHearing, Doc. 48, is DENIED as MOOT by Judge John L. Kane on 08/04/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER of judgment against defendant MODNY, Inc., by Judge John L. Kane on 1/24/2014.(trlee, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 19 Defendant Arc International Holdings, Inc.'s MotionTo Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law and dismiss with prejudice this lawsuit against Arc, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/13/13.(sgrim) (Main Document 27 replaced on 2/13/2013) (sgrim, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
