Turek v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff: Anna Turek
Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 1:2012cv01321
Filed: May 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice 52 is APPROVED; any pending motion, including, but not limited to, the paper filed as docket entry 44 , is DENIED as moot; and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/19/13. (kfinn, )
January 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/25/13. (bnbcd, )
January 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER. Unum's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Rulings on Discovery 30 are OVERRULED. Unum's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Unum's Motion To Stay Discovery 39 is DENIED AS MOOT. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/24/13. (kfinn, )
January 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MINUTE ORDER granting 41 Motion For Leave To File Reply. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/15/2013. (kfinn, )
January 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying 35 Motion to Stay. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/11/13.(bnbcd, )
November 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER: 17 MOTION to Compel Discovery and Certification Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a) filed by Anna Turek is GRANTED. The defendant shall answer Interrogatories 1 and 2 and produce documents responsive to Production Requests 5 and 6 on or before January 11, 2013. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/27/12. (bnbcd, )
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 21 Stipulated Motion to File Redacted Exhibit. Access to Doc. # 17-6 shall be RESTRICTED to Level 1. The redacted copy of Attachment F, submitted as Doc. # 21-2, is accepted for filing and substituted in place of Doc. # 17-6. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/14/2012.(klyon, ) Modified on 11/14/2012 to correct linkage (klyon, ).
August 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: 9 Proposed Scheduling Order was refused, revised proposed scheduling order due on or before 8/27/12. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/10/12. (bnbcd, )
May 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 8/10/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/31/2012. (wjcsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turek v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Represented By: Michael S. Beaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Turek
Represented By: Ellen M. Kelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?