Dawson et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP et al
| Clinton J. Dawson and Janell Dawson |
| Litton Loan Servicing, LP and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. |
| 1:2012cv01334 |
| May 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Mesa |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER denying 124 Motion to Alter Judgment. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 08/07/2015. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
121
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Litton Loan Servicing, LP, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. against Clinton J. Dawson, Janell Dawson re: 120 Order. Signed by Clerk on 09/29/2014. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
73
COURTROOM MINUTES Motion Hearing held on 11/15/2013 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: The court finds that witness Chris Wyatt is refusing to testify without court order and/or subpoena based upon his perception that to do so would subject him to legal process from Goldman Sachs. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Take the Deposition of Witness Chris Wyatt 68 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall serve Mr. Wyatt with a proper Notice of Deposition and a Subpoena to attend a d eposition scheduled for November 26, 2013. Upon receipt of the Notice and Subpoena, the court ORDERS Chris Wyatt to attend the deposition, which may be conducted by telephone or video conferencing, as stated on record. The Court RECOMMENDS that Pla intiffs' Motion to Extend the Time Within Which to File a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 62) 71 be GRANTED, and that the following deadlines be extended: Deadline for Plaintiffs to file a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment shall be December 16, 2013; and 2) Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' response shall be January 10, 2014. FTR: S. Grimm. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
46
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/22/13. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Compel Discovery 34 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted, and the objections a re overruled, regarding responses to interrogatories 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, and 4 and requests for production of documents 1, 2, 4, and 9. The motion is denied, and the objections are sustained, regarding responses to interrogatories 3, 5, 6, and 7, inclu ding all sub-parts, and requests for production of documents 5, 6, 7, and 8, as stated on record. ORDERED: Defendants shall supplement their discovery responses as ordered by June 5, 2013. ORDERED: Plaintiffs may file a supplement to their Motion for Extension of Time notifying the Court of additional documents received and requesting a revised date to respond to 37 Motion for Summary Judgment, as stated on record. ORDERED: Discovery deadline is revised to July 15, 2013. FTR: S. Grimm. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/28/13.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
13
SECOND ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 9/26/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/16/2012. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 8/23/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/11/2012. (kmtcd) Modified on 6/11/2012 to correct hearing date (mnfsl, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
