Pena v. Hartley et al
| Jose Arturo Pena |
| S. Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2012cv01363 |
| May 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, S. Hartley against Jose Arturo Pena re: 44 Order, by Clerk on 5/20/2015. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER re: 37 USCA Mandate. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this civil action is reinstated pursuant to the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on October 31, 2014. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days, Respondents are directed to file an answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of claims 2(c) and 4. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a traverse, if any, and only a traverse, may be filed within thirty days of the filing of the answer. by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/1/2014. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
31
MINUTE ORDER denying 26 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability (Titled as an Application for Certificate of Appealability) and 27 MOTION for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 28 Notice of Appeal by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/3/13.(dbrow, )
|
|
Filing
25
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 24 Order. By Clerk on 5/29/13. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Application. Motion to Reconsider Dismissal of Claims 2(c) and 4 and Objection to Court's Partial Dismissal of Those Claims 23 is Denied. ORDERED that the habeas corpus application is DENIED, and the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIEDby Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 05/28/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and for Answer. ORDERED that Claims 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 3, 4, 5, and 7 are DISMISSED. ORDERED that within thirty (30) days Respondents are directed to file an answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of exhausted Claims 1, 2(d) and 6. ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the filing of the answer Applicant may file a reply, if he desires by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 09/04/12. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/07/2012. (skssl, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/25/2012. (skssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
