Pesick v. Vitamin Cottage Natural Foods Market, Inc., et al.
Mary Rose Pesick |
Vitamin Cottage Natural Foods Market, Inc. |
1:2012cv01368 |
May 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Richard P. Matsch |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER The parties have filed a Joint Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, the court has concluded that the stipulation should be approved and that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED as follows: That the Joint Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice is APPROVED; and That Plaintiffs claims against the Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay his, her, or its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/14/2013.(ervsl, ) |
Filing 23 ORDER Granting Granting Motion to Consolidate, Vacating Order of Reference and Setting Status Conference re 20 and 21 : Civil Action 12-cv-02611-WYD-KLM is consolidated with this action. The Order of Reference to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix in Civil Action No. 12-cv-02611-WYD-KLM is vacated. A status conference in the consolidated cases will be held on March 7, 2013, at 2:30 p.m. in the Conference Room. The existing orders in both cases will be reviewed at that conference, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/28/2013.(rpmcd) Modified on 1/28/2013 (rpmcd ). |
Filing 19 ORDER Granting 18 Motion to Amend Caption: to substitute the name "Mary Rose Muniz" for the name "Mary Rose Pesick,", by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/19/2012.(rpmcd ) |
Filing 14 ORDER to Comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 as to any information to be submitted under restriction based on the 13 Protective Order, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/3/2012. (rpmcd) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting Joint Stipulated 8 Motion to Dismiss Party Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. with prejudice and shall be removed from the caption, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/22/2012.(rpmcd) |
Filing 6 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 8/3/2012 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on July 26, 2012, lead counsel present in person, no parties or representatives of parties permitted to attend and counsel for the defendant shall file a disclosure statement pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.4, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/19/2012. (rpmcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pesick v. Vitamin Cottage Natural Foods Market, Inc., et al. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mary Rose Pesick | |
Represented By: | Mark S. Bove |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vitamin Cottage Natural Foods Market, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Andrew David Ringel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.