Ingram et al v. Clements
| Michael Ray Ingram |
| Frank Clements and James Falk |
| 1:2012cv01653 |
| June 22, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER Adopting and Affirming 39 Report and Recommendations and denying 4 Motion and Brief for Temporary Restraining Order by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/5/13.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw in Part to District Judge and Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that Mr. Ingram's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 18 is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Ingram's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Revoki ng In forma Pauperis Status 20 is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that the Order Revoking In Forma Pauperis Status 16 is revoked. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Frank Clements is dismissed as an improper party to this action. FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint as asserted against remaining Defendant James Falk shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/15/12.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Revoking In Forma Pauperis Status re 5 . FURTHER ORDERED that the Order for an Amended Complaint 9 is vacated, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/5/12. (lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Prisoner Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/06/2012. (skssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
