Fail et al v. USA
| Scott Buchholz, Christian Andersonn, John Zonta, Stacy Truax, Timothy Melson, Scott Philbrick, Jedadiah Zillmer and Dannie Fail |
| USA |
| 1:2012cv01761 |
| July 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Insurance |
| 38 U.S.C. ยง 1975 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 46 Order, by Clerk on 9/30/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
46
Opinion and ORDER Affirming, in Part, and Vacating, in Part, Agency Action. The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART each side's Motion for Summary Judgment (# 30 , 34 ). The Court AFFIRMS the Army's decision to deny benefits (or addit ional benefits) to Mr. Fail, Mr. Buccholz, Mr. Zonta, Ms. Truax, Mr.Philbrick, and Mr. Zilmer. The Court finds that the Armys decisions to deny benefits to Mr. Andersonn and Mr. Melson were arbitrary and capricious, and therefore VACATES those decisi ons, directing the Army to certify the eligibility of Mr. Andersonn and Mr. Melson for benefits as set forth herein. The Court having resolved all matters pending herein, the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/27/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 10/15/2012 at 9:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/6/12. (cbssec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
