In re: Vickery
| Richard K. Diamond |
| Terry Kenneth Vickery |
| Terry Kenneth Vickery |
| United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado and U.S. Trustee |
| 1:2012cv01891 |
| July 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John L. Kane |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT in favor of Richard K. Diamond against Terry Kenneth Vickery re: 41 Order. Civil Case Terminated. by Clerk on 1/28/15. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Affirming the judgment and determination of the Bankruptcy Court. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/26/15. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: Within 21 days the parties shall either 1) file supplemental briefs addressing how the doctrine of collateral estoppel may apply with regard to the previous judgment and each of its component parts (i.e., each of the specific findings made by the jury including punitive damages); or 2) designate their briefs filed on summary judgment in the Bankruptcy Court as part of the record on appeal. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/29/14. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Staying and Administratively Closing Case by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/14/2013. (klyon, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
