XeDAR v. Rakestraw
Plaintiff: XeDAR
Defendant: Don Rakestraw
Counter_claimant: Don Rakestraw
Counter_defendant: XeDAR
Case Number: 1:2012cv01907
Filed: July 23, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/20/13. (dkals, )
November 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/8/13: Dismissal Papers are due by 11/22/2013. (dkals, )
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER denying 38 Defendant Rakestraws Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 39 Plaintiff XeDARs Motion for Summary Judgment, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/16/2013.(ervsl, )
January 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MINUTE ORDER granting 27 MOTION for Leave to File Reply In Support of Rakestraws Motion to Amend, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/28/13. (dkals, )
January 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff XeDAR Corporation's 9 Motion to Dismiss Rakestraw's Counterclaims. XeDAR's Motion is granted insofar as it requests that Rakestraw's Fourth Counterclaim for Breach of Contract be dismissed. Thus, Rakestraw's Fourth Counterclaim is dismissed. XeDAR's Motion is denied in all other respects. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/8/13.(mnfsl, )
November 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/16/12. (bnbcd, )
August 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 10/9/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, proposed order due on or before 10/2/12. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/30/12. (bnbcd, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: XeDAR v. Rakestraw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: XeDAR
Represented By: Bennett L. Cohen
Represented By: Philip Wayne Bledsoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Don Rakestraw
Represented By: Todd Andrew Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Don Rakestraw
Represented By: Todd Andrew Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: XeDAR
Represented By: Philip Wayne Bledsoe
Represented By: Bennett L. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?