Lucero v. Medina et al
Petitioner: |
Anthony J. Lucero |
Respondent: |
John W. Suthers and Angel Medina |
Case Number: |
1:2012cv01919 |
Filed: |
July 23, 2012 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Office: |
Denver Office |
County: |
Fremont |
Presiding Judge: |
Boyd N. Boland |
Nature of Suit: |
General |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 16, 2013 |
Filing
48
ORDER denying 44 MOTION to Proceed in Forma pauperis on Appeal by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/16/13.(dbrow, )
|
July 2, 2013 |
Filing
43
MINUTE ORDER: It is HEREBY ORDERED that the Supplemental Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. # 42 ), filed by Applicant on June 17, 2013, is DENIED for the reasons stated in the June 17, 2013 Order Denying Motion to Reconsider (Doc. # 40 ) . It is FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel for Further Proceedings or Appeal (Doc. # 41 ) is DENIED. If Applicant files a Notice of Appeal, he may file a motion for appointment of counsel in the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 07/02/13. (alvsl)
|
June 17, 2013 |
Filing
40
ORDER denying 39 Motion to Reconsider. It is ORDERED that the "Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment and Request for Certificate of Appealability" (Doc. # 39 ), filed pro se by Applicant, Anthony J. Lucero, on June 12, 2013, and which t he Court has construed as a motion to reconsider filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), is DENIED. The request for a certificate of appealiability is DENIED as moot pursuant to the May 29, 2013 Order (Doc. # 37 ). By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 06/17/13. (alvsl)
|
May 29, 2013 |
Filing
37
ORDER Denying Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Applicant Anthony J. Lucero's Application For a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. # 1 ) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED on the merits. No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the jurisdictional and procedural rulings are correct and whether the Amended Application states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 05/29/13. (alvsl)
|
April 18, 2013 |
Filing
35
ORDER denying 33 Applicant's Motion to Reconsider Motion for Free Transcripts. Applicant shall file his Traverse on or before 5/17/2013. No further extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of just cause. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/18/13.(mnfsl, )
|
March 21, 2013 |
Filing
32
ORDER denying 30 Motion for Free Trial Transcripts and 26 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. 28 Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Traverse is granted in part. 27 Motion for Discovery Per Habeas Rule 6, 29 Request for an Evidentiary Hearing, and 31 Request for Funds Per Criminal Justice Act are denied as premature. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/21/13.(dkals, )
|
February 22, 2013 |
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER denying as unnecessary 23 Applicant's Motion Seeking Permission to Send Only Original to Court on all Future Filing/Pleadings. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/22/13.(mnfsl, )
|
January 16, 2013 |
Filing
17
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/16/2013. (skl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?