Richfield Hospitality, Inc. v. Charter One Hotels and Resorts, Inc. et al
Richfield Hospitality, Inc. |
Thomas Farinacci, Steve Cook and Charter One Hotels and Resorts, Inc. |
1:2012cv01937 |
July 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Michael E. Hegarty |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 ORDER denying 82 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs on Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/10/2013.(klyon, ) |
Filing 80 ORDER granting 18 Motion to Remand; denying as moot 17 Defendants' Renewed Motion To Dismiss or, in the Alternative, To Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division; the Trial Prepar ation Conference set 10/4/2013 and the trial set 10/21/2013 are VACATED; and this case is REMANDED to the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado (where it was filed originally as Case No. 2011CV3916). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/14/13. (kfinn, ) |
Filing 79 MINUTE ORDER granting 77 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Initial expert designation: February 11, 2013; Rebuttal expert designation: March 11, 2013; Discovery cutoff: April 8, 2013. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/4/13. (kfinn, ) |
Filing 74 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Status Conference held on 11/15/2012. Defendants shall produce to Plaintiff all communications up to 5/4/2011, including drafts, between any representative of Charter One and any representative of Glidden House, as stated on the record. The 72 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is granted. FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501. (mehcd) |
Filing 65 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 62 Joint Motion for Entry of Confidentiality Order. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 09/25/12. (alvsl) Modified on 9/26/2012 to add "Confidentiality" to docket text (kfinn, ). |
Filing 59 ORDER granting 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint to Add Claim for Exemplary Damages Pursuant to CRS §§ 7-74-104 and 13-21-102. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file [26-1] Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. In the interest of judicial efficiency and maintaining a consistent docket, 4 the "Amended Complaint" entered on 7/25/2012 is hereby STRICKEN. Defendants shall respond to the newly-entered Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and all applicable local and federal rules. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/18/2012. (mehcd) |
Filing 46 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/4/2013 03:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 10/4/2013 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Five (5) day Jury Trial set for 10/21/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/30/12. (rebsec, ) |
Filing 42 MINUTE ORDER granting 24 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Provide Separate Additional Documents from State Action and Amended Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet for Notices of Removal. The Court accepts [24-1] Exhibit A and the documents listed in [24-2] Exhibit B as filed. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/14/2012. (mehcd) |
Filing 9 ORDER by District Court Judge Morris B. Hoffman on September 13, 2011. Text Only Entry (johar, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.