Richfield Hospitality, Inc. v. Charter One Hotels and Resorts, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Richfield Hospitality, Inc.
Defendant: Thomas Farinacci, Steve Cook and Charter One Hotels and Resorts, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv01937
Filed: July 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER denying 82 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs on Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/10/2013.(klyon, )
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER granting 18 Motion to Remand; denying as moot 17 Defendants' Renewed Motion To Dismiss or, in the Alternative, To Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division; the Trial Prepar ation Conference set 10/4/2013 and the trial set 10/21/2013 are VACATED; and this case is REMANDED to the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado (where it was filed originally as Case No. 2011CV3916). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/14/13. (kfinn, )
February 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MINUTE ORDER granting 77 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Initial expert designation: February 11, 2013; Rebuttal expert designation: March 11, 2013; Discovery cutoff: April 8, 2013. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/4/13. (kfinn, )
November 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Status Conference held on 11/15/2012. Defendants shall produce to Plaintiff all communications up to 5/4/2011, including drafts, between any representative of Charter One and any representative of Glidden House, as stated on the record. The 72 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is granted. FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501. (mehcd)
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 65 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 62 Joint Motion for Entry of Confidentiality Order. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 09/25/12. (alvsl) Modified on 9/26/2012 to add "Confidentiality" to docket text (kfinn, ).
September 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint to Add Claim for Exemplary Damages Pursuant to CRS §§ 7-74-104 and 13-21-102. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file [26-1] Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. In the interest of judicial efficiency and maintaining a consistent docket, 4 the "Amended Complaint" entered on 7/25/2012 is hereby STRICKEN. Defendants shall respond to the newly-entered Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and all applicable local and federal rules. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/18/2012. (mehcd)
August 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/4/2013 03:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 10/4/2013 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Five (5) day Jury Trial set for 10/21/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/30/12. (rebsec, )
August 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MINUTE ORDER granting 24 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Provide Separate Additional Documents from State Action and Amended Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet for Notices of Removal. The Court accepts [24-1] Exhibit A and the documents listed in [24-2] Exhibit B as filed. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/14/2012. (mehcd)
July 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by District Court Judge Morris B. Hoffman on September 13, 2011. Text Only Entry (johar, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richfield Hospitality, Inc. v. Charter One Hotels and Resorts, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Farinacci
Represented By: Joel Wesley Kiesey
Represented By: Frank W. Visciano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Cook
Represented By: Joel Wesley Kiesey
Represented By: Frank W. Visciano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charter One Hotels and Resorts, Inc.
Represented By: Frank W. Visciano
Represented By: Joel Wesley Kiesey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richfield Hospitality, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin P. Parrott
Represented By: William C. Brittan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?