Scales 'N Tails Franchising, LLC v. Beall et al
| Scales 'N Tails Franchising, LLC |
| Ronald F. Beall and Pilar Beall |
| 1:2012cv02001 |
| July 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| William J. Martinez |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Motion to Vacate. The scheduling conference set for October 15, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED. The scheduling conference is RESET for October 18, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/09/12. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER granting 17 the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Interplead Funds. It is ORDERED that plaintiff Scales N Tails Franchising, LLC shall endorse to the order of the court the check paid by P and R Enterprises, LLC, on behalf of defendants, dated July 10, 2012 in the amount of $1,704.29, and tender the check to the court in order that such funds may be held in the courts registry, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/28/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 10/1/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/2/2012. (mjwcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
