Albright v. State of Colorado et al
Gregory Dean Albright |
Steve Hartley, State of Colorado and Seventeenth Judicial District, The |
1:2012cv02174 |
August 16, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Crowley |
Boyd N. Boland |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and denying the motions for refund 46 and 50 , by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/26/13. No certificate of appealability will issue. (dkals, ) |
Filing 35 MINUTE ORDER denying 27 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis re 24 Notice of Appeal ; denying 29 Motion for Leave to Appeal, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/28/13.(lswsl ) |
Filing 23 ORDER Overruling Objection. ORDERED that the objection titled Objection to Magistrate [Judge] Denial and Directives" 22 filed pro se on December 13, 2012, by Plaintiff, Gregory Dean Albright, is overruled. FURTHER ORDERED that, if Mr. Albright fails to file an amended pleading as directed within the time allowed, the complaint 12 and the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/28/12. (sgrim) |
Filing 19 ORDER denying 14 Motion to Recuse and Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/26/2012.(sks) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/20/2012. (skssl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.