Humood, v. City of Aurora, Colo., The ,et al.,
Abeer Humood |
Bernard. Celestin, Sandra. Sweeney, Dave Williams, City of Aurora, Colorado, The, Wilkinson, Jason (I) Condreay, Ponich, Ken. Sullivan and Deb. Wallace |
1:2012cv02185 |
August 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Boyd N. Boland |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 ORDER adopting 52 Report and Recommendations, granting 28 Motion to Dismiss, granting 31 Motion to Dismiss, granting 32 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/28/2014.(trlee, ) |
Filing 13 ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/17/2012. (rbjsec. ) |
Filing 10 ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/09/12. (nmmsl, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER Directing Plaintiff To File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/04/12. (nmmsl, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/21/12. (nmmsl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.