Robledo-Valdez v. Trani et al
C. Robledo-Valdez |
Travis Trani and Tom Clements |
1:2012cv02203 |
August 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Boyd N. Boland |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MINUTE ORDER. Applicant's Request for Credit for Time Served (ECF No. 41) is DENIED because this action has been dismissed. "Plaintiffs Advisory and Request" (ECF No. 44), which has been docketed as a motion, and Plaintiffs "Request for Emergency Relief" (ECF No. 45), are DENIED because this action has been dismissed and the motions are not relevant to the dismissal of this action by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 09/17/13.(jjhsl, ) |
Filing 42 ORDER denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/23/13.(jjhsl, ) |
Filing 36 FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that the amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 9 is denied and the instant action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ORDERED that here is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) by Clerk on 06/26/13. (jjhsl, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER. ORDERED that Applicant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (ECF No. 34) is DENIED. ORDERED that Respondents' Motion to Dismiss as Moot (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED. ORDERED that the amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 9) is DENIED and the instant action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ORDERED that the pending Motion to Supplement/Amend Claim (ECF No. 27) is DENIED and the Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement/Amend Claim (ECF No. 29) is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/25/13.(jjhsl, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER to Dismiss in Part. ORDERED that unexhausted claims one, two, and three in the amended application are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Applicant's request to dismiss those claims voluntarily. ORDERED that Applicant shall have 21 days from the date of this order to file a response, if any, to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss as Moot by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/06/13. (jjhsl, ) |
Filing 22 Minute ORDER denying 20 Motion to Reconsider Order and to Supplement Claim, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/21/12.(lygsl, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER To Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/10/12 re: 9 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Craig S. Robledo-Valdez. It is ORDERED that Applicant show cause within thirty (30) days from the date of this order wh y the amended habeas corpus application should not be denied as a mixed petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The action will be dismissed without further notice if Applicant fails to show cause as directed within the time allowed. (nmmsl, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER To File Preliminary Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/18/12. (nmmsl, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/20/2012. (skssl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.