Maunz v. Colorado Court of Appeal's
Petitioner: William A. Maunz
Respondent: Colorado Court of Appeal's
Case Number: 1:2012cv02225
Filed: August 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Pueblo
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MINUTE ORDER denying 50 Motion for Amended Complaint Against S.C.C.F. Law Library Assistant and Obstruction of Justice From S.C.C.F. Employees and 51 Motion to Suppress Irrelevant Immaterial and Incompetent Pre-Answer Response by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/29/13.(dkals, )
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER of Dismissal: 29 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied, as are 45 Motion to Toll Extension/Enlargement, 46 Motion to Dismiss (Vacate) the Colorado Attorney General Office Objection of Applicants Petition/Motion (lack of) Prima Facie, on There [sic] Pre-Answer Response, and 47 Motion for Extension/Enlargement, Applicants Clarification of Intent. No certificate of appealability will issue, and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/17/13. (dkals, )
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying 42 Motion for Amended Stay of Proceedings; granting 43 Motion for Extension/Enlargement (Estoppel), by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/22/2013.(skl)
April 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER denying 40 Motion for Stay of Proceedings, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/02/2013.(skl)
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/07/13 DENYING as moot 36 Motion for Question of Law; and GRANTING 38 Motion for Extension of Time. Applicant shall have up to and including April 15, 2013, to file areply to Respondents Pre-Answer Response (ECF No. 35) that was filed on February 27, 2013. (nmmsl, )
February 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/12/2013. (skl)
January 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MINUTE ORDER granting 26 Motion to Stay of Proceedings/Stay of Execution Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/15/2013.(skl)
January 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/08/13 GRANTING 24 Motion to Clarify as follows: the rules pertinent to computing time periods are set forth in Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.(nmmsl, )
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/21/12. (nmmsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maunz v. Colorado Court of Appeal's
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William A. Maunz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Colorado Court of Appeal's
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?