Myers v. City of Loveland, Colorado, The et al
| Bernard Kenneth Myers |
| Colorado County of Larimer, The and City of Loveland, Colorado, The |
| 1:2012cv02317 |
| August 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 83 Order. By Clerk on 7/9/13. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER Overruling Objections to and Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [# 72 ]013, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court. The objections stated in plaintiff' s Status Update and Reaffirmation of Motion To Withdraw Complaint [# 77 ] are OVERRULED. The objections stated in Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order [# 75 ] [# 76 ], are OVERRULED AS MOOT. The Order of Reference [# 80 ] is WI THDRAWN. Plaintiff's Motion To Voluntary [sic] Dismiss Case Without Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) [# 79 ] is DENIED. Defendant City of Loveland, Colorado's Motion To Dismiss [# 23 ] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion To Reque st Leave of Court To Amend Plaintiffs [sic] Complaint [# 68 ] is DENIED. Plaintiff's claims against defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment with prejudice SHALL ENTER in favor of defendant, The City of Loveland, Colorado, against plaint iff, Bernard Kenneth Myers, on all claims for relief and causes of action asserted in this action. Pursuant to my Order of Dismissal as to Defendant The Colorado County of Larimer, Only [# 16 ] judgment with prejudice SHALL ENTER in favor the prior d efendant, The Colorado County of Larimer, against plaintiff, Bernard Kenneth Myers, on all claims for relief and causes of action asserted in this action. Defendant, The City of Loveland, Colorado, is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the clerk of the court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/8/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER; Defendant's 42 Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings, Including Discovery and Trial Pending Determination of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. All disclosure and discovery are STAYED pending resolution of the Motion to Dismiss 23 , by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/31/2012.(klmcd, )
|
|
Filing
39
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/21/2013 03:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 6/21/2013 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Three (3) day Jury Trial set for 7/8/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/29/12. (rebsec, )
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 17 Motion to Move Council [sic] for the City of Loveland to Comply with Scheduling Order. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/5/2012. (kfinn, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT THE COLORADO COUNTY OF LARIMER, ONLY granting 15 MOTION to Dismiss Party. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Larimer County, Colorado are DISMISSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/2/12. (mjgsl, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel and denying 3 Motion for Service. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/5/12.(mjgsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
