Friedman v. Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. et al
Allen Friedman |
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc., Dollar Rent A Car, Inc. and DTG Operatons, Inc. |
1:2012cv02432 |
September 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Kathleen M. Tafoya |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 270 ORDER Denying 261 Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Certification of a Question of Law to the Colorado Supreme Court, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/13/2016.(evana, ) |
Filing 247 ORDER In accordance with my Order issued this same date on Plaintiffs pending motions ECF No. 246 , which is incorporated by reference herein, it is ORDERED that the Courts prior Order of July 1, 2015 ECF No. 222 is hereby amended sua sponte to r eflect my ruling in ECF No. 246 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) that in my opinion the Order involves a controlling question of law to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion, and an immediate appeal from the Order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/10/2015. (evana, ) |
Filing 228 ORDER Denying 223 Plaintiffs Expedited Motion to Stay Enforcement of July 1, 2015 Order, or, in the Alternative, for Continuation of Deadline to File Fifth Amended Complaint, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/21/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 222 ORDER that Defendants Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Class Certification filed May 7, 2015 ECF No. 205 is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is FURTHER ORDERED that while I previously granted Plaintiffs and Intervenor- Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certi fication filed February 17, 2015 ECF No. 166 , that motion is now DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion to Strike with Respect to Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Complaint filed May 21, 2015 ECF N o. 212 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth in this Order. Finally, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a Fifth Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days of this Order, or by Tuesday, July 21, 2015, that removes the class allegations and the claims that have previously been dismissed, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/1/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 220 COURTROOM MINUTES for Status, Scheduling, Motion Hearing held on 6/16/2015 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: The discovery deadlines are extended as follows: Rule 702 Motions, Expert, and Fact Discovery Cut off: September 28, 2 015, Dispositive Motions Deadline: October 28, 2015, Defendants' Rebuttal Experts, if any, as discussed: August 1, 2015. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for December 4, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. The p arties shall initiate a conference call and contact 303-335-2780 at the scheduled time. The parties shall submit a status report on or before November 20, 2015. Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Witness List and to Bar Plaintiffs' Use of Improperly Disclosed Experts 148 is DENIED, as stated on record. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim) |
Filing 204 MINUTE ORDER Granting 201 Defendants Expedited Motion to Amend or Clarify Judge Daniels April 23, 2015 Minute Entry filed April 27, 2015. To clarify, the Courts April 23, 2015 Minute Entry ECF No. 200 does not constitute a definitive order gr anting a motion for class certification as contemplated under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f). Instead, a separate formal order including the Courts reasoning and conclusions will issue shortly after completion of the proposed order process directed by the Court in the April 23, 2015 Minute Entry, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/5/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 200 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Wiley Y. Daniel: Motion Hearing held on 4/23/2015. ORDERED:1.Plaintiffs' And Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 166 filed 2/17/2015 is GRANTED. A class is certified as to the CCPA claim only. ORDERED:2.Plaintiffs shall submit a Proposed Order by Friday, May 8, 2015. Plaintiffs shall show the Proposed Order to Defendants before submitting it to the Court. ORDERED:3.Defendants shall not file a response to the Third A mended Complaint. ORDERED:4.Plaintiffs have up to and including May 8, 2015 to file their Fourth Amended Complaint. Defendants have up to and including May 23, 2015 -- or 14 days from date of service -- to respond. Hearing concluded. Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel. (dhans, ) |
Filing 186 ORDER that Plaintiff-Intervenors Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint for Purposes of Permitting Intervention ECF No. 165 is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Third Amended Complaint shall be filed with the Court by Tuesday, April 14, 2015, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/8/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 160 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 104 Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may, if they choose, file a new motion for class certification with a revised class definition. T his motion shall be filed on or before Tuesday, February 17, 2015. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Objections to Defendants Evidence Submitted in Support of Their Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification filed November 20, 2014 ECF No. 133 are OVERRULED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Objection to the Courts Consideration of the Expert Testimony of Donald R. Lichtenstein filed December 15, 2014 ECF No. 150 is OVERRULED. by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/27/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 122 MINUTE ORDER granting 120 Defendants Motion for Enlargement of Page Limit for Brief in Opposition to Motion for Class Certification. Defendants may file a response brief of up to 35 pages in length in opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification., by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/3/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 103 MINUTE ORDER granting 102 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Page Limit for Brief in Support of Motion for Class Certification., by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/2/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 95 MINUTE ORDER granting 92 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Class Action Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiffs Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial and exhibits. (Doc. N o. 92 -1 at 5-79.) Further, the deadline for Defendants to answer or respond to the First Amended Complaint and the deadlines for briefing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint are VACATED. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint no later than June 23, 2014, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/22/14.(sgrim) |
Filing 63 Stipulated Order Regarding Expedited Motion for Sanctions and Entry of Protective Order. The pending Expedited Motion for Protective Order and for Sanctions 46 is hereby WITHDRAWN without prejudice as moot by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 05/17/13.(jjhsl, ) |
Filing 45 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/26/2013. (kmtcd) |
Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER Denying as moot 18 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Denying as moot 19 Defendants' Motion to Strike ; Denying as moot 21 the Unopposed Joint Motion to Extend Time to File Response and Reply to Motions to Dismiss and Strike and Response to First Amended Complaint by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/3/2012.(ervsl, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2012 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/25/2012. (kmtcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.