Alexander et al v. Johnson
| Vincent Todd Martin, Jesse Nelson, Jasmines Leah, Robert Hampton, Darlene Hampton and Delories Alexander |
| Stacie Bourleson, Denzale Bourleson, Paul Thorn, Deputy Starks, Kathey Hampton, Deputy Cooper, Jeff Johnson, Dallas Bourleson and Paul Bouleson |
| 1:2012cv02513 |
| September 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER denying 41 motion to amend, and directing the clerk to strike any future filings that bear no relevance to the reasons for the dismissal of this action, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/21/14.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER denying 31 Motion to Reopen by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/8/14.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/27/12, Directing Plaintiff Vincent Todd Martin To Cure Deficiency. ORDER: Clerk of the Court is directed to mail this order to Plaintiff Martin at the Denver Sheriff Department and use his prisoner number 0432861. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court also mail a copy of this order to Mr. Martin at the address he provided in part on page two of the Prisoner Complaint, 2850 Albion Street, Denver, CO 80207. (nmmsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
