Harris v. Bowlen et al.
Plaintiff: Marquise D. Harris
Defendant: Pat Bowlen, Denver Broncos Foot Ball Organization and Pat (I) Bowlen
Case Number: 1:2012cv02534
Filed: September 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 AMENDED ORDER. ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris's Motion To Dismiss 49 is GRANTED, and the above captioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris's Motion For Recusal 48 , is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion To Dismiss The Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) And 12(b)(6) 32 , is DENIED AS MOOT by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/18/13. (jjhsl, )
March 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER. ORDERED that Marquise D. Harriss Motion To Dismiss 49 is GRANTED, and the above captioned case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERED that Marquise D. Harriss Motion For Recusal 48 , is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED that the Defendants Motion To Dismiss The Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) And 12(b)(6) 32], is DENIED AS MOOT by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/12/13.(jjhsl, )
November 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Setting Status Conference for 12/17/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/16/12. (jjhsl, )
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/9/12. (nmmsl, )
October 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER granting 7 Motion to Strike, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/29/2012.(skssl, )
October 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/25/12, Of Recusal. The Clerk of the Court shall cause this case to be reassigned to another Magistrate Judge. (nmmsl, )
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/27/2012. (skssl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Bowlen et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pat Bowlen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Denver Broncos Foot Ball Organization
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pat (I) Bowlen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marquise D. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?