Miller v. Best Buy, Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Ron Miller
Defendant: Best Buy, Co., Inc., HSBC Finance Corporation, Inc. and HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2012cv02535
Filed: September 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice. The Court, having reviewed the parties' 93 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice, and being fully informed in the premises, hereby GRANTS the stipulated motion. This action is Dismissed with Prejudice, parties to bear their own fees and costs. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 09/04/13. (alvsl)
August 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER Motion # 22 (by HSBC Nevada to dismiss for failure to state a claim) will be applied to the Second Amended Complaint and as such it is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Motion # 24 (by Best Buy Co., Inc. and HSBC Finance to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction) is DENIED; Objection # 55 (by plaintiff to the magistrate judges order denying his motion to show cause) is DENIED; Objection # 68 (by plaintiff to the magistrate judges order striking his Second Amended Complaint) is MOOT; Motion # 73 (by plaintiff for leave to file his Second Amended Complaint) is GRANTED; and Recommendation # 84 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/23/2013.(ervsl, )
May 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: This matter has been scheduled for a three-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on April 14, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for March 21, 2014 at 8:00 a.m. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 05/06/2013. (rbjsec. )
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Scheduling Conference held on 5/2/2013, denying without prejudice 62 Motion for Leave. Discovery due by 11/29/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 12/20/2013. FTR: Courtroom C-201. (kmtcd)
April 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MINUTE ORDER denying 45 Plaintiffs Expedited Motions for Reconsideration of Order Denying Leave to File Motion to Show Cause and Leave to File Such. Plaintiff is granted an extension to and including April 15, 2013, to file responses to the motio ns to dismiss. No further extensions will be granted in this regard. Because of this extension, Plaintiff will not be prejudiced, and there is no reason to issue an order to show case, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/29/2013.(ervsl, )
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER granting 32 Motion to Clarify. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of Doc. No. 29 . The defendants are ORDERED to send copies of the motions to dismiss and briefs in support of the motions to dismiss to Plaintiff at t he address listed in the Court's docket no later than March 8, 2013, and to file a certificate of service regarding the same. Defendants shall serve Plaintiff with any other electronically filed documents according to the local and federal ru les. Plaintiff may respond to the Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 22 and 24 ) on or before April 1, 2013. Defendants may reply in accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR7.1C. The Scheduling Conference and other deadlines set in the Order Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference and Rule 26 (f) Planning Meeting (Doc. No. 30 ) will not be continued. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 03/07/13. (alvsl)
February 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 5/2/2013 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/19/2013. (kmtcd)
December 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/27/2012. (sks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Best Buy, Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ron Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Buy, Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HSBC Finance Corporation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?