Colucci v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
| Brenda Colucci |
| Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and HRTC I, LLC |
| 1:2012cv02581 |
| September 28, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 03/12/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 4/4/2013 at 10:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 28, 2013, lead counsel present in person and no parties permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/25/2013. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER re: 11 : the deadline, to and including January 25, 2013, for defendant to designate non-parties at fault 11 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/27/2012. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT HRTC I, L.L.C. AND FOR SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE re: 11 : defendant HRTC I, LLC., is dismissed and the only defendant in this civil action is Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. d/b/a Home Depot and this matter will be set for scheduling conference, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/21/2012. (rpmcd )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
