Hayes v. Conahan, et al
Petitioner: Willie T. Hayes
Respondent: Genie Conahan, Board, Matthew Goldberg and Anthony P. Young
Case Number: 1:2012cv02590
Filed: September 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Logan
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 JUDGMENT re: 33 Order of Dismissal, by Clerk on 4/26/13. (sgrim)
April 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER denying as unnecessary 28 Motion for Ruling of Habeas Corpus; denying as unnecessary 29 Motion for Ruling of Habeas Corpus, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/02/2013.(skl)
January 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/04/13 GRANTING 15 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint; and GRANTING 15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Pre-Answer Response. ORDERED that Applicant, Willie T. Hayes, will be allowed up to and including January 21, 2013, in which to file a reply to Respondents pre-answer response filed on December 17, 2012. It is FURTHER ORDERED the claims raised in the amended application, and the amended application itself (ECF No. 12), are deemed abandoned. The Court will not address the amended application further.(nmmsl, )
December 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Willie T. Hayes, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/17/2012. ORDERED that the Applicant has 15 days to inform the court whether he intends to proceed with the claims challenging his conviction and sentence already raised in the habeas corpus application he originally filed [ECF No. 1] (sks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayes v. Conahan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Willie T. Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Genie Conahan
Represented By: Ryan Alan Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Board
Represented By: Ryan Alan Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Goldberg
Represented By: Ryan Alan Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Anthony P. Young
Represented By: Ryan Alan Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?