Nichols v. I-Flow, LLC, et al.,
Plaintiff: Taffy Nichols and Nolan Nichols
Defendant: DJO Global, Incorporated, I-Flow, LLC and DJO, LLC
Case Number: 1:2012cv02691
Filed: October 11, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Boulder
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Presiding Judge: William J. Martinez
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. In light of the 51 Stipulation for Dismissal, Defendant I-Flow is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action, accordingly. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/7/13. (mnfsl, )
April 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The 49 Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of Defendants DJO, LLC and DJO Global, Incorporated Without Prejudice is granted. The aforementioned Defendants are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/5/13.(mnfsl, )
December 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 TRIAL PROCEDURES ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/7/2014 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Jury Trial set for 7/7/2014 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Trial Preparation Conference set for 6/2/2014 at at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/19/2012. (mehcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nichols v. I-Flow, LLC, et al.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DJO Global, Incorporated
Represented By: James Andrew Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I-Flow, LLC
Represented By: Jordan Lee Lipp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DJO, LLC
Represented By: James Andrew Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taffy Nichols
Represented By: Randall John Paulsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nolan Nichols
Represented By: Randall John Paulsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?