U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lunn et al
Plaintiff: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Geoffrey H. Lunn, Darlene A. Bishop and Vincent G. Curry
Case Number: 1:2012cv02767
Filed: October 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: R. Brooke Jackson
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER granting 61 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Order Setting Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest and Civil Penalty against Defendant Geoffrey H. Lunn. A copy of this Order has been mailed to Defendant Lunn, Register No. 40376-013, at: BIG SPRING CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 2001 Rickabaugh Dr., Big Spring, TX 79720. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/8/2018. (cthom, )
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER adopting 53 Report and Recommendations. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/14/2014.(trlee, )
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/2/14. At the request of the parties, and in view of the pending criminal prosecution of Mr. Lunn, this matter is STAYED pending further order of the court. Parties shall file a status report, on or before July 7, 2014, addressing the status of the criminal prosecution and whether further proceedings should be scheduled in this action. (bsimm)
March 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER granting 44 Motion to Dismiss its Claims for Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest and a Civil Penalty against Defendant Darlene A. Bishop. FURTHER ORDERED that the Judgment as to Defendant Darlene A. Bishop 38 is hereby modified only as to Section V to reflect the dismissal of such claims; and FURTHER ORDERED that the Judgment as to Defendant Darlene A. Bishop is otherwise unaffected and remains in full force and effect. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/17/2014.(trlee, )
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 33 the Joint Motion for Consent Judgment against Defendant Geoffrey H. Lunn and Setting Briefing dates, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/1/2013.(ervsl, )
July 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER granting 35 Plaintiff's Motion to Suspend the Due Dates Set in the Court's Order Settling Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference and Rule 16(f) Planning Meeting. Scheduling Conference set for July 25, 2013, and all related deadlines, are VACATED. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/17/13.(bnbcd, )
June 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 7/25/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, proposed scheduling order due by 7/18/13. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/4/13. (bnbcd, )
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER of Default Judgment (granting 24 Motion for Default Judgment). Vincent G. Curry is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act, Sections 10 (b) and 15(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; Vincent G. Curry is ordered to disgorge $399,930 in ill-gotten gains and to pay $28,914.11 in prejudgment interest; Inasmuch as the plaintiff has provided no basis on which the Court could determine an appropriate and reasonable amount of a civil monetary penalty to assess against this defendant in addition to the disgorgement and interest specified above, the Court declines to impose a civil monetary penalty pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77t(d) and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3). By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 04/25/13. (alvsl)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/23/2012. (rbjsec. )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lunn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Jedediah B. Forkner
Represented By: Anne Catherine McKinley
Represented By: Gregory Paul von Schaumburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geoffrey H. Lunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darlene A. Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vincent G. Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?