2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture, LLC v. Ghost Hole Partners, LLC, et al
Plaintiff: 2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture, LLC
Defendant: David J. Fitzpatrick and Ghost Hole Partners, LLC
Case Number: 1:2012cv02868
Filed: October 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Routt
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER of Dismissal. Plaintiff's Motion To Dismiss Defendant Hock With Prejudice [# 42 ] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against defendant, David Hock, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs. This case is CLOSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/30/2013.(klyon, )
April 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER of Dismissal as to Defendant Ghost Hole Partners, LLC, Only. 37 Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Defendant Ghost Hole Partners, LLC, Without Prejudice Pursuant To Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) is Granted. Plaintiff's claims again st defendant, Ghost Hole Partners, LLC, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs. Defendant, Ghost Hole Partners, LLC, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/15/2013. (klyon, )
April 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER of Dismissal as to Defendant David J. Fitzpatrick, Only. The Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Defendant Fitzpatrick With Prejudice [# 35 ] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against defendant David J. Fitzpatrick are Dismissed with prejudice. Defendant David J. Fitzpatrick is dropped as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/5/2013. (klyon, )
January 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER granting 9 Motion to to Amend Complaint. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/2/13. (kfinn, )
November 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 1/24/2013 11:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/13/2012. (kmtcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture, LLC v. Ghost Hole Partners, LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David J. Fitzpatrick
Represented By: Michael Reid Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ghost Hole Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 2010-1 RADC/CADC Venture, LLC
Represented By: Cristel Dawn Shepherd
Represented By: William R. Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?