Shirley v. City of Aurora, Colorado et al
| Melissa Shirley |
| City of Aurora, Colorado, Michael Anthony Mangino and Michael (I) Anthony Mangino |
| 1:2012cv02877 |
| October 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 2/19/2013. The court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 28 Motion to Strike 27 Notice (Other). This motion is denied to the ex tent that it seeks to strike the 26(a) disclosures completely. This motion is granted to the extent that it seeks an order assigning restriction level one to this particular filing. The court shall order that the Clerk's Office restrict access (a level one restriction) to 27 Notice (Other) filed by Michael Anthony Mangino. This restriction shall limit access of this document to only the parties of this case and the court. FTR: Robin Mason. (cbscd, )
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/5/13. (cbssec)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 1/31/2013 at 9:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/6/12. (cbssec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
