Thomas v. State of Colorado et al
| Demetrius Thomas |
| State of Colorado and CDOC |
| 1:2012cv03078 |
| November 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 72 Motion to Seal. Plaintiff has failed to identify a sufficiently compelling reason to warrant an order from the court sealing this case in its entirety. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/21/2015.(cbslc2)
|
|
Filing
57
JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of CDOC, Johnson, Mr. K, State of Colorado, Susan Jones, Tom Clements against Demetrius Thomas re: 56 Order by Clerk on 2/20/2014. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 41 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motionto Dismiss (Doc. 39 ). Plaintiff's Response to Defendants['] Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 39 ) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Judge Blackburn's Civil Practice Standards. On or before Thursday, 7/18/2013, Mr. Thomas may file a revised response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, no longer than 15 pages. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/19/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/11/2013. (skl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
